How did they dispose of all the placentas, etc.?
Where are the skeletons of the millions of people and animals? They might have had "vegetarian manna" delivered by Uber Eats, but they likely would have sacrificed animals. Minds boggle.
Doug
i think the excellent thread on the wandering jews having to defecate outside the camp could have explored further implications, such as animal faeces, and also the fact that when women are in a group they cycle (menstruate) together.
imagine what the place was like with their attitude towards a menstruating woman, or with the disposal of the "rags".how did they dispose of all the placentas, etc.
?where are the skeletons of the millions of people and animals?
another subject in my attempt to understand the second temple period.. https://www.academia.edu/s/980704b536?source=link .
doug.
TruthMatters
What did I write?
Doug
another subject in my attempt to understand the second temple period.. https://www.academia.edu/s/980704b536?source=link .
doug.
Another subject in my attempt to understand the Second Temple period.
https://www.academia.edu/s/980704b536?source=link
Doug
i have provided additional material to my study on the literature of the second temple period:.
https://www.academia.edu/s/f9266830b9?source=link .
doug .
Hi,
I have provided additional material to my Study on the literature of the Second Temple period:
https://www.academia.edu/s/f9266830b9?source=link
Doug
"jesus christ was resurrected on nisan 16, 33 c.e., the day when the jewish high priest offered up the firstfruits of the barley harvest.
this fits in accurately with jesus' being the "firstfruits" in the resurrection of the human dead.
(1 cor.
The term “firstborn” is a single word and it refers to rank, it does not relate to being born, as the following shows:
“Jesus Christ was resurrected on Nisan 16, 33 C.E., the day when the Jewish high priest offered up the firstfruits of the barley harvest. This fits in accurately with Jesus' being the ‘firstfruits’ in the resurrection of the human dead. (1 Cor. 15:20) This put Jesus Christ in the first ‘rank.’ Just as in the Jewish barley harvest there were afterfruits to be reaped, so too there must be afterfruits in the resurrection: of the dead. But since Jesus Christ ranks first, Paul called him ‘the firstborn from the dead, that he might become the one who is first in all things.’”—Col. 1:18. (The Watchtower, June 15, 1979)
while the word "satan" appears in many translations of the old and new testament, it is much more common in the n.t., with only a few mentions in the o.t.
the word "devil" seems almost exclusively used in the n.t., at least in the few versions i checked.
this may have something to do with the word origin, satan v devil.
In the OT, "the" Satan was an opposer. In Job it was a son of God who carried out YHWH's instructions and was limited to that action. He would be something like a Public Prosecutor.
The word :"devil" comes to us from the Septuagint -- the Greek translation of the Hebrew scriptures, where they used the word "Diabolos" which became Devil.
When the 3rd century BCE Jews (and more particularly the common class) used their creative imagination (and ideas from their neighbours) they invented a spirit world along with an evil class of spirits, a war within heaven, and a Leader of the angles they invented as having "fallen". This Leader was given a range of names, the most popular being Mastema (see Jubilees), Azazel, Beliar, Belial, Beelzeboul, Satan, and so forth, depending on the region where he resided. Later on, closer to the time of the NT, they invented daemons (demons), which influence carried over to Christianity (another Jewish sect) and to Islam.
https://jwstudies.com/2TP_A_Spirit_World.pdf
https://jwstudies.com/Revolutions_Satan__Lucifer__Devil.pdf
Doug
"jesus christ was resurrected on nisan 16, 33 c.e., the day when the jewish high priest offered up the firstfruits of the barley harvest.
this fits in accurately with jesus' being the "firstfruits" in the resurrection of the human dead.
(1 cor.
"Jesus Christ was resurrected on Nisan 16, 33 C.E., the day when the Jewish high priest offered up the firstfruits of the barley harvest. This fits in accurately with Jesus' being the "firstfruits" in the resurrection of the human dead. (1 Cor. 15:20) This put Jesus Christ in the first "rank.”
"Just as in the Jewish barley harvest there were afterfruits to be reaped, so too there must be afterfruits in the resurrection of the dead. But since Jesus Christ ranks first, Paul called him "the firstborn from the dead, that he might become the one who is “first in all things."—Col. 1:18.
"By his sacrificial death Jesus Christ bought back or redeemed all the human family who are dying "in Adam." (The Watchtower, June 15, 1979, page 22)
i appreciate the feedback that i received from my study into the mysticisms and mysteries of the second-temple period (which is a period that includes the nt, particularly paul) and their ongoing impact.. i have now completely reworked it and hopefully i have addressed the concerns that were raised.. the information is structured thematically:.
1. celestial ascents.
2. mysticisms.
I appreciate the feedback that I received from my Study into the Mysticisms and Mysteries of the Second-Temple period (which is a period that includes the NT, particularly Paul) and their ongoing impact.
I have now completely reworked it and hopefully I have addressed the concerns that were raised.
The information is structured thematically:
1. Celestial Ascents
2. Mysticisms
3. The Mysteries
4. Descent from Heaven
Plus two Appendices.
I am very open to criticisms, which I welcome with open arms.
https://www.academia.edu/s/c441f4ced5
Doug
i recently had an online exchange with an active jw about the blood issue.
he originally wanted to talk about the potential dangers of transfusions but i pointed out that the risks of transfusions have nothing whatsoever to do with the reason that jws reject blood, and therefore i didn’t see any value in debating that topic.. not able to let it go, he then insisted that the blood mandate was a common theme throughout the bible, quoting acts 15:29.. it’s been a while since i looked into the subject, and i admit i’m now a little rusty when it comes to recalling where to find biblical quotes, but i remembered that there are passages in both the new and old testaments that, when read in the context of the time they were written, call into question the watchtower’s rendition of acts 15:29.. i offered to do some bible research and get back to the jw, suggesting that rather than letting our discussion become combative, we could have an informative and interesting exchange of ideas.
i reassured him that i was not looking to undermine his convictions, in fact i was more than happy to be corrected if my thinking was wrong.
I have gathered much on the subject over the years:
https://jwstudies.com/blood.html
These appear on that page and might be helpful:
https://jwstudies.com/Handling_Medical_Evidence.pdf
https://jwstudies.com/Letter_from_Ray_Franz.jpg
https://jwstudies.com/The_Meaning_of__Blood_.pdf
As you say, every medical procedure carries risks, and one should never promote or deny a procedure based on ancient mythologies. The decision must be made by those qualified to make it.
Doug
i don't know if anyone is interested in the subject of the mysteries and mysticisms of the second-temple period (including paul and the gospels) but if so:.
https://www.academia.edu/s/61773ba12f?source=link .
doug.
Thank you, Terry.
I turned page 8 on its head, I was wrong and I appreciate your help.
Please tell me if it is still out of whack - and anywhere else.
------------
Appropriate to other things, I came across the following passage in an old book languishing unloved for many a year:
Those who regard the
prophets mainly as guides to the future are likely to be disappointed by this
work. For me, "the prophets speaks primarily to the men of his own
time, and his message springs out of the circumstances in which he lives"
(Men Spake from God, Ellison, page 4). Hence we will best understand
Ezekiel as we try to grasp what his own generation should have understood and
only then reinterpret, if necessary, in the light of the New Testament. In
dealing with the prophecies of the future. I have therefore been normally more
concerned with what Ezekiel's contemporaries were to understand by them than
what we may read into them from the standpoint of the New Testament. (Ezekiel: The Man and His Message, Ellison,
(1956), 11).
Doug